The week started with a statement “I am going to have a Google Free week”. What did this mean, well put it simply I was going to hold back from using any of Google’s services for 7 days, explore the other side of the Interweb and see where it got me. All was fine (part from the odd hidden link from friends) till I came across this in my twitter feed: http://google-au.blogspot.com/2010/03/turn-left-at-chemist-and-ill-meet-you.html.
Yes, Google has released logo’s into the mapping interface so of course I had to check it out, forgetting about my Google free week.
With the advent of loading an icon onto a map, paying for this privilege, businesses can now stand out from the crowd, heighten themselves from the text that can sometime plague and swamp a map. Still questions are now being asked into how Google will ‘rank’ order of preference for an icon to be seen on the map and what type of business can have their logo’s incorporated into a map. Big business that would normally attract a high number of search hits seems to be where the drive is taking the Google Empire and of course along comes their wallets.
Still it is a step in the right direction and does open the door for the niche player who wants a slice of the apple pie. I can’t help thinking though, with the drive that Google has to use location data as core to its advertising empire will we all fall in line and accept Google’s data as the norm? Weigh it up:
And the list goes on……although it is that final point listed above that I believe will be key. Imagine this, I have data and I want to overlay this onto a map, Google has this wonderful tool and so I use it. Times this by all the people who collect data and there it is. All data, when captured aligned to Google’s location framework.
Have they won the positioning fight? Will all data simply use Google as a core alignment? Time will tell I guess.
Btw. In starting to use other providers in my attempt at a Google free week I was impressed with Bing and in the effort to draw in data from other sources Government still has the best quality data going!
It is no surprise to see that more and more application creation competitions are popping up all over Australia in response to the global push to release and access more public sector information (PSI). Victoria is the latest state to launch a competition for innovative application that showcase the best use of PSI data.
The Mashup Australia and Apps4NSW competitions proved to be quite popular (Apps4NSW is still open for those interested: http://www.information.nsw.gov.au/apps4nsw) although one component that sets the App My State competition apart from the rest is hidden in the terms and conditions where only Victorians can enter. Still that hasn’t deterred me from trying (being from Western Australia) and one can only hope that the organisers of this competition realise that idea’s can spring up from anywhere and still benefit Victoria.
Personally I like the idea of open innovation and how these ideas to be tested amongst the public in an open forum. Mobile applications, the web, interaction and social networking are the mediums where new information is quickly released and facilitates a very smart path to reaching critical mass. These competitions have even pathed the way for new innovative businesses to take advantage of this push for open data. Kaggle.com.au is an example of an innovaive business structured around this style of competition. Data has to go somewhere doesn’t it?
The change we have seen in this industry over the last 2 years has heightened the core element of “location” and its importance to how information can be accessed and integrated creating a common understanding. Visual interpretation of information via maps has allowed a large audience to grasp the understanding and meaning of data and how it relates to the day to day life of you and me.
Let’s face it; the public are the ones who would get the most use out of information so it will be interesting to see what this competition brings us.
How much power can one company have? With the news of Google being awarded their patent for embedding location into their advertising model I wonder what the future will be for businesses using ‘location’ in advertising their offerings.
Location is a core element in today’s information society and has been integral to almost all aspects of development in the past. Maps, Addresses etc.. are core in finding where I am and where I am going to. In a business sense, the location of the business is key to selling goods and services whether that location is land based or web based as someone is conducting the work somewhere.
In this time of companies being sued for patent infringement some parts of the patent lodged by Google could be questionable. For example, in a broad sense the patent secures the use of geo-information in computer systems to link a request to an output. This means that if I use my location as the core component in the search criteria to find my local coffee shops and the computer system locates these for me and details the offerings (an ad) then at that point the service I am using could be breaching the patent.
Of course the Google patent refers to the advertising model which drives the Google ads system it can be expanded across many types of service offerings. With regarding to mobile applications and the increase usage of GPS in these devices basically making them location aware, any search from a mobile device for services ‘around me’ Applications such as Walk Score, Around Me, Urban Spoon could be reigned in by Google. As real estate basis its housing advertisements primarily on address (the core location reference globally), this may be affected.
Google is keeping tight lipped on the patent at the moment and so it is with interest we watch this space. The push for location advertising kingdom looks to be between Apple and Google and so in Australia where location is embedded in everything and many companies utilise location for services it will be interesting to see how the fallout might affect us. The question I have is that if Google and others rely on the information provided by Governments and US Department of Defence for GPS then will they licence and pay a royalty on the ongoing use of this core location asset information?
It must be noted that this patent was filed almost 6 years ago and signifies that Google has the foresight to look into the long term and secure its market place and so kudus to them!